2025考研英语二基础训练 华研外语研二MBA MPA MPAcc含阅读理解完型写作翻译模拟可搭考研英语真题词汇

考研英语二基础训练适用对象：
    大三考研、在职考研、基础薄弱的考研英语二考生；做考研真题有难度的学生；词汇量不足，看不懂真题文章的考生；练习考研英语二真题有难度的MBA、MPA、MPAcc、教育、艺术、工程、体育等专业硕士学位考生。

推荐理由：
1. 分类突破考研英语二阅读理解、考研英语二完形填空、考研英语二作文和考研英语二翻译几大题型；
2. 考研英语二模拟题4套，方便冲刺；
3. 考研英语二词汇和考研英语二长难句同步注释，免查词典；
4. 解析详尽，中英文左右对照排版，版面清晰好用；
5. 总结考研英语二真题命题规律和解题技巧，帮助考生提高答题准确率；
6. 分册装试卷版，方便携带做题；
7. 配套视频课，助力考生科学备考。

1. 考研英语二完形填空，应试讲座 10篇训练；
2. 考研英语二阅读理解A节，应试讲座 32篇训练；
3. 考研英语二阅读理解B节，应试讲座 12篇训练；
4. 考研英语二翻译（英译汉），应试讲座 15篇训练；
5. 考研英语二写作，应试讲座 45篇训练；
6. 考研英语二模拟题4套冲刺试卷；
7. 考研英语二7节解题技巧视频课。

华研是国内知名的英语教育类图书策划机构，致力为英语学习者提供高效的方法和优质的内容。旗下“华研外语”品牌涵盖大学英语四六级、考研英语、英语专业四八级、雅思托福、高考英语、英语AB级考试、中小学英语等系列图书。
    TOPWAY是华研的做事原则，经验表明，方法得当就会事半功倍，让您花更少的时间取得更好的学习效果；“沙里淘金”是华研的思维方式，通过语料库分析、词汇分频、难度分级等诸多科学手段，让您抓住问题的关键，用20%的精力取得80%的成效，体现“二八定律”，从而达到“四两拨千斤”的效果。

分册《考研英语二阅读理解A节》
部分 考研英语二阅读理解A节应试讲座
考研英语二题型介绍视频课
考研英语二阅读理解Part A备考视频课
        讲座一：抓住7大常见考点
        讲座二：考场决胜的3招阅读技巧
        讲座三：掌握正确选项的3大特征
        讲座四：掌握干扰项设置的4大规律
    第二部分 考研英语二阅读A基础训练32篇

第二分册《考研英语二完形填空与阅读理解B节》
  考研英语二完形填空·英语知识运用
部分 完形填空应试讲座
考研英语二完形填空备考视频课
        讲座一：完形填空3大命题规律
        讲座二：完形填空5大解题技巧
    第二部分 完形填空基础训练10篇

  考研英语二阅读理解B节
部分 考研英语二阅读理解B节应试讲座
考研英语二阅读理解Part B备考视频课
        讲座一：多项对应题的5大解题技巧
        讲座二：小标题对应题的4大解题技巧
        讲座三：小标题对应题干扰项的2大设置规律
    第二部分 考研英语二阅读B基础训练12篇

第三分册《考研英语二翻译与写作》
  考研英语二翻译·英译汉
部分 考研英语二英译汉应试讲座
考研英语二英译汉备考视频课
        讲座一：如何看懂英文长难句
        讲座二：如何敲定关键词义
        讲座三：准确翻译的7大技巧
    第二部分 考研英语二英译汉基础训练15篇

  考研英语二写作
部分 考研英语二写作应试讲座
    考研英语二写作备考视频课
        讲座一：3类应用文格式
        讲座二：应用文写作句型
        视频课
讲座三：大作文4大写作技巧
        讲座四：大作文写作句型
    第二部分 考研英语二作文·热点小作文25篇
    第三部分 考研英语二作文·热点大作文20篇
     
考研英语二模拟题及详解Model Test 1
考研英语二模拟题及详解Model Test 2
考研英语二模拟题及详解Model Test 3
考研英语二模拟题及详解Model Test 4

Why does Peter Drucker continue to enjoy such a high reputation? Part of the answer lies in people’s mixed emotions about management. The management-advice business is one of the most successful industries of the past century. When Drucker first turned his mind to the subject in the 1940s it was a backwater. Business schools were treated as poor relations by other professional schools. McKinsey had been in the management-consulting business for only a decade and the Boston Consulting Group did not yet exist. Officials at General Motors doubted if Drucker could find a publisher for his great study of the company, “Concept of the Corporation”.
    Today the backwater has turned into Niagara Falls. The world’s great business schools have replaced Oxbridge as the nurseries of the global elite. The management-consulting industry will earn revenues of $300 billion this year. Management books regularly top the bestseller lists. Management masters can command $60,000 a speech.
    Yet the practitioners of this great industry continue to suffer from a severe case of status anxiety. This is partly because the management business has always been prey to fads and frauds. But it is also because the respectable end of the business seems to lack what Yorkshire folk call “bottom”. Consultants and business-school professors are forever discovering great ideas, like re-engineering, that turn to dust, and wonderful companies, like Enron, that burst into flames.
    Peter Drucker is the perfect antidote to such anxiety. He was a genuine intellectual who, during his early years, rubbed shoulders with the likes of Ludwig Wittgenstein, John Maynard Keynes and Joseph Schumpeter. He illustrated his arguments with examples from medieval history or 18th-century English literature. He remained at the top of his game for more than 60 years, advising generations of bosses and avoiding being trapped by fashion.
    But Drucker was more than just an antidote to status anxiety. He was also a preacher of management. He argued that management is one of the most important engines of human progress: “the organ that converts a mob into an organization and human effort into performance”. He endlessly extended management’s empire. From the 1950s onwards he offered advice to Japanese companies as well as American ones. He insisted that good management was just as important for the social sector as the business sector.