China Foreign-related Commercial Selected Cases“一带一路”司法理论与实务纵览涉外商事案例精选

　　“一带一路”建设极具复杂性，相关的司法服务保障涵盖的法律问题范围很广。本书为《“一带一路”司法理论与实务纵览涉外商事案例精选》的英文版，推出英文版能够为国内外相关专家和实务界人士了解中国海事海商领域法律适用提供便利，增进沿线各国法律职业人士的相互了解、相互熟悉、相互认同。

Chapter OneInternational Sales of Goods
1.Sinochem International (Overseas) Pte Ltd. v. ThyssenKrupp Metallurgical
Products GmbH for Dispute over a Contract for the International Sale of
GoodsRen Xuefeng
2.Moawea Deri Import & Export Co., Ltd. v. Dalian Xinruilong Import &
Export Trade Co., Ltd. for Dispute over a Contract for the International Sale
of GoodsHe Lichun
3.Zoha Trading Company v. Xingtai Dongfang Bicycle Co., Ltd. and Tianjin
Textile Group Import and Export Inc. for Dispute over a Contract for the
International Sale of GoodsTang Na and Zhao Wei
4.UGRINEKS D.O.O. v. Cangzhou Ritian PipeFittings Manufacture Co., Ltd. for Dispute over a Contract for the
International Sale of Goods Zhang Hongchuan
5.GLOBTRANSBAT v. Hangzhou Fuxing Group Co., Ltd. for
Dispute over a Contract for the International Sale of GoodsZhang Baojun
6.SLS Company Co., Ltd. v. Liaoning Chengda Trade Development Co., Ltd. (Third
Party Dandong Shengde Food Co., Ltd. ) for Dispute over a Contract for the
International Sale of GoodsFan Chunyu
Chapter TwoEquity Disputes
7.Shenzhen Jindalai Investment Management Co., Ltd. v. Suqian Yinkong Water
Co., Ltd. and United Water Corporation for Dispute over Equity TransferGu Haoli
8.JAMAL JEBREEN ABDEL RAHMAN ALABSI v. Anji Rongsheng
Fitness Equipment Co., Ltd., et al. for Dispute over Equity TransferZhu Ying
9.Inner Mongolia Jiatai Investment Group Co., Ltd. v. China Bao’an Group Co., Ltd. et al. for Dispute over Equity TransferLin Jianyi
10.Jiang Kaisheng v. Jiang Weitian, Jiang Chuangsheng et al. for Dispute over
Confirmation of Qualification as a ShareholderLin Jianyi
Chapter ThreeOther Contractual Disputes
11.Yonghe Industrial Company, Malaysia Profits Group v. Xixiang County Peoples Government for Contractual DisputeChang Baotang
12.Runipsys (Wuhan) Co., Ltd. v. Wuhan Branch of TNT China International
Express Co., Ltd., et al. for Dispute over a Contract for Carriage of Cargo by
AirLi Peimin
13.Vered Hasharon Travel & Tours Ltd. v. Huang for Dispute over a Tourism
Contract Zhou Tingting
14.Fujian Materials Group Co., Ltd. v. Fujian Chengming Metal Smelting Co.,
Ltd. ,et al. for Contractual DisputeHuang Zhijiang
Chapter FourArbitration and Judicial Examination on Judgment Abroad
15.Siemens International Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Golden
Landmark Co., Ltd. for the Application for Recognition and Enforcement of a
Foreign Arbitration AwardJiang Shan and Huang Ying
16.A Case Involving the Application of Tangcheng International Trading Limited
for Enforcement of a Foreign Related Arbitral AwardGen Xiaoning and Zhang Xin
17.Zhejiang Yisheng Petrochemical Co., Ltd. v. INVISTA Technology Co., Ltd. for
Dispute over the Application for Confirming the Effect of an Arbitration
ClauseHu Shuwei and Zhao Jiangtao
18.Von Bundit Co., Ltd. v. Ningbo Beson International Trade Co., Ltd. for
Dispute over the Application for Recognition and Enforcement of a Foreign
Arbitral AwardSun Bin
19.Noble Resources Pte Ltd. v. Zhejiang Xiongsheng Industrial Co., Ltd. for
Dispute over the Application for Recognition and Enforcement of a Foreign
Arbitral AwardQin Shankui
20.Case of Application by Tipper Tie Inc. for the Recognition and Enforcement
of the Ruling Rendered by the Delaware Court of Chancery in the United
StatesZeng Zhiyan
21.Przedsibiorstwu Przemyslu Chlodniczego “FRIGOOPOL” S.A.w Opolu v. Ningbo Yongchang
Industrial & Trading Co., Ltd. for Recognition and Enforcement of a Foreign
Civil JudgmentMao Jianer
Chapter FiveIntellectual Property
22.Louis Vuitton Malletier v. Dongfang Hotel,Xi’an for
Dispute over Infringement upon the Exclusive Right to Use a Registered
TrademarkChang Baotang
23.Bayer Aktiengesellschaft v. Luohe Guanghui Industry Co., Ltd. and Zhao for
Dispute over Infringement upon the Exclusive Right to Use Registered Trademarks
and Unfair CompetitionZhao Zheng
24.Park Chun Hee v. Li for Dispute over Infringement upon Trademark RightLi Guangjun
Chapter SixInfringement and Other Issues
25.Poland General Directorate for National Roads and Highways v.China Overseas
Engineering Group Co. Ltd. and the ExportImport Bank
of China for Tort DisputeZhu Ke
26.Shaanxi Gold Land Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Hong Kong Hua Li International
Co., Ltd. and Qinghai Xingqing Industry and Trade Engineering Group Co., Ltd.
for Tort DisputeQi Weijun
27.Gharibwal Cement Limited (Gharibwal Company) v. Sinoma Technology &
Equipment Group Co., Ltd. (Sinoma Company) and Industrial and Commercial Bank
of China Limited, Tianjin Branch (ICBC Tianjin Branch) for Dispute over Fraud
in GuaranteeGeng Xiaoning and Yang Zeyu
28.Viewing the ThirdParty Law Ascertainment Mechanism
from the Perspective of the Case of Water Solutions (Hong Kong), Limiteds Application for the Confirmation of the Effect of the Arbitration
AgreementZheng Shuyi

　　PREFACE

　　“BELT & ROAD” INITIATIVE: JUDICIAL

　　THEORIES AND PRACTICES
SERIES

　　PREFACE

　　The “Belt & Road” Initiative is a major
strategic deployment made by the CPC Central Committee with President Xi
Jinping at its core out of consideration from both domestic and international
perspectives to proactively meet the profound changes in global situations, is
an important driver of the comprehensive deepening of reform in response to
practical demands in a new era, creates a new mode of international cooperation
and global governance, sets forth higher requirements for the building of the
rule of law in new situations, and provides even broader developmental space
for the work of the peoples courts as well as
jurisprudential study.

　　On July 8, 2015, the
Supreme Peoples Court issued the Several Opinions on
the Provision of Judicial Services and Safeguards by the Peoples Courts for the Development of the “Belt
& Road” Initiative, clarifying the guiding
principles and standards for the peoples courts at all
levels to hear “Belt & Road” related cases. In order to strengthen the theoretical research on
the judicial services and safeguards for the “Belt
& Road” Initiative, the Supreme Peoples Court formed the SPC Belt & Road Judicial Research Center,
under which there are judicial research bases, such as the SPC “Belt &
Road” Initiative Judicial Research Base, SPC FTZ Judicial Research Base, and
SPC Oceanic Judicial Protection Theoretical Research Base, and proof of foreign
law research bases.

　　For more than three
year, based on Chinas national conditions and judicial
patterns, all research bases have vigorously conducted jurisprudential research
on specific issues encountered in the development of the “Belt & Road” Initiative, borrowed
theories and practices from foreign jurisdictions, made tremendous
achievements, and played an import role in studying emerging judicial issues
and supporting national decisionmaking, among others.
In order to sum up judicial experience in the development of the “Belt & Road” Initiative in a timely
manner and maximize the service and guarantee role of the peoples courts in the development of the “Belt
& Road” Initiative, the SPC Belt & Road
Judicial Research Center compiled the series of “Belt
& Road” Initiative: Judicial Theories and
Practices.

　　The series is oriented
to the judicial needs in the development of the “Belt
& Road” Initiative, and pays attention to the
combination of theory and practice, particularly to the summarization of trial
experience in typical cases in the development of the “Belt & Road”
Initiative, promoting theoretical enrichment and innovation based on practice
to address practical issues. The series also highlights a strategic standpoint
and a full field of view, and summarizes achievements in proof of foreign law
and research results of great reference value to judicial practices, not only
as an important summarization of Chinas practical
judicial experience but also as a means to present the world with Chinas judicial wisdom and judicial experience.

　　As research deepens,
the SPC Belt & Road Judicial Research Center will conduct further forward

　　looking, pertinent, and
reserve research on emerging issues in the development of the “Belt & Road” Initiative, offer more
specialized and constructive recommendations, and release more books that may
guide practices and serve as an important reference for decisionmaking under the series, so that the series could truly become
reference books for theoretical research and practice discussions, providing
high quality and high level theoretical guidance for the peoples courts to serve and protect the development of the “Belt &
Road” Initiative.

　　Luo Dongchuan

　　VicePresident of the Supreme Peoples Court and
Justice

　　March 7th, 2019