描述
开 本: 16开纸 张: 胶版纸包 装: 平装是否套装: 否国际标准书号ISBN: 9787308110426
《议会制辩论:
架构与攻略》一书由编著者根据自身辩论教学与裁判工作经验，针对中国学生的实际需求，对议会制辩论中不同角色的论辩策略和论辩技巧做了归纳总结，主要内容为论辩双方论辩辞的建构策略。本书力图以简单朴素的语言和出自国际辩论名家的经典案例，让英语辩论爱好者轻松了解议会制辩论的不同赛制和不同角色辩手论辩辞的建构策略，提高辩论水平。适合高校课堂教学或辩论培训之用。
《议会制辩论——架构于攻略》是一本详细阐述英国议会制辩论模式与技巧的书籍。本书收录了来自各国（既有母语为英语的国家又有母语为非英语国家）辩论冠军的辩论辞，并辅以专业辩论教练和高校教师的点评，是一本水平和专业性较高，适合英文和辩论爱好者的理想读物。
学术性质的英国议会制辩论赛考验了选手的思维能力、表达能力，而对于英语非母语的中国学生而言，这种挑战又加深了一层。对于选手们在联赛上常常被提问的问题，本书也准备了详尽的答案可供参考。
本书分成六个部分：在第一单元里，作者对英国议会以及议会制辩论体系作出详细的阐述。第二部分讨论了首相演讲的基本框架和技巧。第三部分中，作者详细回答了反对方演讲的两个基本问题：如何驳斥首相以及如何组织反对论据。第五单元中作者对策略技巧展开一系列的延伸与发展，教授学生更多的辩论技巧。最后一个单元主要探讨了辩论总结的方式方法。
本书对英国议会制辩论进行了全方位的阐述和技巧培训指导，跟已经出版的大部分同类书籍相比，在创新性和真实性方面，都遥遥领先。同时，本书收集的讲稿全部由国际知名辩手或裁判亲自撰写，包括William
Bernard Jones(2009年“世界大学生辩论赛”冠军)、Sharmila
Parmanand(连续三年荣获“亚洲大学生辩论赛”冠军)、Leela
Koenig(2009年“世界大学生辩论赛”*辩手(ESL))、Yoni
Cohen-Idov(2011年“欧洲大学生辩论赛”总裁判长)和Suthen Thomas
(Tate)(2012年“亚洲大学生辩论赛”总裁判长)等，有一定的代表性。
本书非常适合演讲辩论学生使用与参考，同时为正在培养逻辑思维、表达能力和宽阔视野的学生们提供了更好的帮助。本书也富含大量的国际政治与历史信息，可供学生与老师学习。
“2010年浙江省本科院校第二批省级实验教学示范中心建设项目”成果之一。
Module 1 Academic British Parliamentary Debate
Ⅰ Parliament
1. The House of Commons
2. The House of Lords
3. The Government and the Opposition
Ⅱ Authentic British Parliamentary Debate
Ⅲ Academic British Parliamentary Debate in WUDC Style
Ⅳ Academic British Parliamentary Debate in Asian Style
Ⅴ Motions
1. Motions of Value
2. Motions of Policy
3. A Closed Motion
4. A Semi-closed Motion
5. An Open Motion
6. Rules for Interpreting a Motion
Ⅵ Case
1. Case Statement
2. Argument
3. Evidence
4. Integrating Argument and Evidence
5. Rebuttal
Ⅶ POI
Module 2 Format and Strategies of the PM’s Speech
Ⅰ Opening Remarks
1. Presenting an Attention Gainer
2. Interpreting the Motion
3. Claiming the Stance
4. Articulating the Solution Plan/Model
5. Offering a Preview of the Key Arguments
6. Explaining the Burden of Proof
7. Describing the Team Line
8. Tips for the Opening Remarks
Ⅱ Substantiation
1. Proving Justification
2. Proving Workability
Ⅲ Conclusion
Ⅳ Transitional Devices
Ⅴ Reasoning Strategies
1. Creating a Link between Case Statement and Arguments
2. Creating a Link between Argument and Evidence
Module 3 Format and Strategies of the LO’s Speech
Ⅰ Opening Remarks
1. Assumption Model
2. Problem Claiming Mode
3. Sources for Detecting Problems
4. Beginning the Speech with a Stance Statement
5. Beginning the Speech by Claiming to Maintain the Status
Quo
Ⅱ Substantiation
1. Presenting the Rebuttals and the Arguments Respectively
2. Integrating the Rebuttals and the Arguments
Ⅲ Rebuttal Strategies
1. Clarifying the PM’s Interpretation or Definition
2. Offering Strategic Agreement
3. Shifting Concepts
Ⅳ Defending Strategies
1. Proposing a Counterplan
2. Challenging the Burden of Proof
3. Comparing Consequences
4. Questioning Effectiveness
5. Digging out Missed Arguments
Module 4 Format and Strategies of DPM and DLO’s Speeches
Ⅰ Opening Remarks
Ⅱ Repairing-oriented Rebuttal
1. Model of Repairing-oriented Rebuttal
2. Repairing through Clarification
3. Repairing through Strategic Agreement
4. Repairing through Clarification on the Model
5. Repairing Deconstructed Interpretation or Definition
Ⅲ Refutation-oriented Rebuttal
1. Strategic Agreement
2. Picking out Flawed Analogies or Examples
3. Picking out Irrelevant Arguments
4. Proving Insufficient Analysis
5. Attacking One-sidedness of an Argument
6. Proving Self-contradiction
Ⅳ Expansion
1. Challenging the Burden of Proof
2. Questioning Fairness
3. Analyzing the Clash Points
4. Detecting a Problem Shared by Both Sides
5. Proving Non-mutual Exclusivity
6. Defending Mutual Exclusivity
Module 5 Format and Strategies of Member Speeches
Ⅰ Opening Remarks
Ⅱ Extension
1. Defending a Weakened Argument
2. Expanding an Existing Argument
3. Responding to an Opposing Argument
4. Comparing Effectiveness of Two Different Models
Ⅲ Rebuttal
1. Responding to an Opposing Argument
2. Questioning Consistency
Module 6 Format and Strategies of Whip Speeches
Ⅰ Opening Remarks
1. Beginning the Speech with a Comment on the Principle
Issues
2. Beginning the Speech with a Summary of the Clash Points
3. Beginning the Speech with Questions on the Clash Points
4. Beginning the Speech by Claiming Weak Engagement
Ⅱ Summary Models
1. “RA-ADE-RA” Model
2. “AHRP” Model
Ⅲ Summary Strategies
1. Highlighting the Extension
2. Expanding the Case by Adding New Evidence
3. Expanding the Case with In-depth Analysis
4. Defending Effectiveness of the Proposal
5. Attacking Effectiveness of the Proposal
……
评论
还没有评论。