描述
开 本: 大32开纸 张: 胶版纸包 装: 精装是否套装: 否国际标准书号ISBN: 9787510031205
编辑推荐
在中国现代化的进程中，西方哲学社会科学始终是*重要的思想资源。然而，一个令人遗憾的事实是，自19 世纪末20 世纪初“西学东渐”起，国人对于西学的了解，基本上是凭借零星的翻译和介绍，认真地去读原著的人少之又少。这些中译本，囿于译者的眼光和水平，往往与原著出入颇大。因此，国人谈论西学的情景，很像是瞎子摸象，虽然各执一词，却皆不得要领。
当然，100年间，还是出现了一批学贯中西的学者，但其中肯花工夫于译业的太少。许多年积累下来，我们在这个领域拥有的优质中译本依然十分有限。而且，再好的译本，毕竟与原著隔了一层。倘若我们的学术界始终主要依靠中译本去了解和研究西学，我们的西学水平就永远不能摆脱可怜的境况。
好在现在有了改变这种境况的条件。在当今全球化时代，随着国门进一步开放，中外交流日渐增多，人们普遍重视英语学习，国人中尤其年轻人中具备阅读英文原著能力的人越来越多了。在这种形势下，本丛书应运而生。编辑者的计划是，选择西方哲学、人文学科、社会科学领域的*基本的英文经典原著，分批陆续出版，为有志者提供价廉的版本和阅读的便利。我赞赏这样的善举，并且相信，这也是为学术界做的一件益事。
周国平
2010 年2 月24 日
当然，100年间，还是出现了一批学贯中西的学者，但其中肯花工夫于译业的太少。许多年积累下来，我们在这个领域拥有的优质中译本依然十分有限。而且，再好的译本，毕竟与原著隔了一层。倘若我们的学术界始终主要依靠中译本去了解和研究西学，我们的西学水平就永远不能摆脱可怜的境况。
好在现在有了改变这种境况的条件。在当今全球化时代，随着国门进一步开放，中外交流日渐增多，人们普遍重视英语学习，国人中尤其年轻人中具备阅读英文原著能力的人越来越多了。在这种形势下，本丛书应运而生。编辑者的计划是，选择西方哲学、人文学科、社会科学领域的*基本的英文经典原著，分批陆续出版，为有志者提供价廉的版本和阅读的便利。我赞赏这样的善举，并且相信，这也是为学术界做的一件益事。
周国平
2010 年2 月24 日
内容简介
本书是康德三大批判著作、也是其全部哲学著述中意义为特殊和重大的巨著，《纯粹理性批判》改变了整个西方哲学前进发展的方向和进程。康德花了11年的时间完成，1781年初版，1787年再版。贯彻始终的根本指导思想就是：通过对理性本身、即人类先天认识能力的批判考察，从而确定它能认识什么和不能认识什么，在这基础上对形而上学的命运和前途作出终的判决和规定，其使命是为真正的、作为科学的形而上学提供坚实可靠的基础。
本书被公认为是德国哲学家伊曼努尔 康德流传为广泛，*影响力的著作，同时也是整个西方哲学*重要和影响深远的著作之一。初版于1781年，并于1787年再版的该书，常被称做康德的“批判”，并与其后的《实践理性批判》和《判断力批判》并称为康德“三大批判”。在这部西方哲学奠基式的著作中康德尝试将理性主义和经验主义接合起来，并以此反对大卫 休谟彻底的经验主义。
本书被公认为是德国哲学家伊曼努尔 康德流传为广泛，*影响力的著作，同时也是整个西方哲学*重要和影响深远的著作之一。初版于1781年，并于1787年再版的该书，常被称做康德的“批判”，并与其后的《实践理性批判》和《判断力批判》并称为康德“三大批判”。在这部西方哲学奠基式的著作中康德尝试将理性主义和经验主义接合起来，并以此反对大卫 休谟彻底的经验主义。
目 录
1 INTRODUCTION.
1.1 I. Of the difference between Pure and EmpiricalKnowledge
1.2 II. The Human Intellect, even in anUnphilosophical State, is in Possession of Certain Cognitions “apriori”.
1.3 III. Philosophy stands in need of a Science whichshall Determine the Possibility, Principles, and Extent of HumanKnowledge “a priori”
1.4 IV. Of the Difference Between Analytical andSynthetical Judge-ments
1.5 V. In all Theoretical Sciences of Reason,Synthetical Judgements “a priori” are contained as Principles
1.6 VI. The Universal Problem of Pure Reason
1.7 VII. Idea and Division of a Particular Science,under the Name of a Critique of Pure Reason
2 TRANSCENDENTAL DOCTRINE OF ELEMENTS.
2.1 FIRST PART. TRANSCENDENTAL AESTHETIC
SECTION I. Of Space
SECTION II. Of Time
2.2 SECOND PART. TRANSCENDENTAL LOGIC
INTRODUCTION. Idea of a TranscendentalLogic
I. Of Logic in General
II. Of Transcendental Logic
III. Of the Division of General Logic intoAnalytic and Dialectic
IV. Of the Division of Transcendental Logic intoTranscendental Analytic and Dialectic.
TRANSCENDENTAL LOGIC. FIRST DIVISION
BOOK I
CHAPTER I. Of the TranscendentalClue to the Discovery of all Pure Conceptions of theUnderstanding.
CHAPTER II Of the Deduction of thePure Conceptions of the Understanding
BOOK II. Analytic of Principles
CHAPTER I. Of the Schematism at ofthe Pure Conceptions of the Understanding
CHAPTER II. System of all Principlesof the Pure Understanding
CHAPTER III. Of the Ground of theDivision of all Objects into Phenomena and Noumena
TRANSCENDENTAL LOGIC. SECOND DIVISION
TRANSCENDENTAL DIALECTIC.INTRODUCTION
I. Of Transcendental IllusoryAppearance.
II. Of Pure Reason as the Seat ofTranscendental Illusory Appearance
BOOK I. OF THE CONCEPTIONS OF PURE REASON
SECTION I Of Ideas in General
SECTION II. Of TranscendentalIdeas
SECTION III. System ofTranscendental Ideas.
BOOK II. OF THE DIALECTICAL PROCEDURE OF PUREREASON
CHAPTER I. Of the Paralogisms ofPure Reason
CHAPTER II. The Antinomy of PureReason.
CHAPTER III. The Ideal of PureReason.
3 TRANSCENDENTAL DOCTRINE OF METHOD.
3.1 CHAPTER I. The Discipline of Pure Reason
3.1.1 SECTION I. The Discipline of PureReason in the Sphere of Dogmatism
3.1.2 SECTION II. The Discipline of PureReason in Polemics
3.1.3 SECTION III. The Discipline of PureReason in Hypothesis
3.1.4 SECTION IV. The Discipline of PureReason in Relation to Proofs
3.2 CHAPTER II. The Canon of Pure Reason
3.2.1 SECTION I. Of the Ultimate End ofthe Pure Use of Reason
3.2.2 SECTION II. Of the Ideal of theSummum Bonum as a Determining Ground of the Ultimate End of PureReason
3.2.3 SECTION III. Of Opinion, Knowledge,and Belief
3.3 CHAPTER III. The Architectonic of PureReason
3.4 CHAPTER IV. The History of Pure Reason
1.1 I. Of the difference between Pure and EmpiricalKnowledge
1.2 II. The Human Intellect, even in anUnphilosophical State, is in Possession of Certain Cognitions “apriori”.
1.3 III. Philosophy stands in need of a Science whichshall Determine the Possibility, Principles, and Extent of HumanKnowledge “a priori”
1.4 IV. Of the Difference Between Analytical andSynthetical Judge-ments
1.5 V. In all Theoretical Sciences of Reason,Synthetical Judgements “a priori” are contained as Principles
1.6 VI. The Universal Problem of Pure Reason
1.7 VII. Idea and Division of a Particular Science,under the Name of a Critique of Pure Reason
2 TRANSCENDENTAL DOCTRINE OF ELEMENTS.
2.1 FIRST PART. TRANSCENDENTAL AESTHETIC
SECTION I. Of Space
SECTION II. Of Time
2.2 SECOND PART. TRANSCENDENTAL LOGIC
INTRODUCTION. Idea of a TranscendentalLogic
I. Of Logic in General
II. Of Transcendental Logic
III. Of the Division of General Logic intoAnalytic and Dialectic
IV. Of the Division of Transcendental Logic intoTranscendental Analytic and Dialectic.
TRANSCENDENTAL LOGIC. FIRST DIVISION
BOOK I
CHAPTER I. Of the TranscendentalClue to the Discovery of all Pure Conceptions of theUnderstanding.
CHAPTER II Of the Deduction of thePure Conceptions of the Understanding
BOOK II. Analytic of Principles
CHAPTER I. Of the Schematism at ofthe Pure Conceptions of the Understanding
CHAPTER II. System of all Principlesof the Pure Understanding
CHAPTER III. Of the Ground of theDivision of all Objects into Phenomena and Noumena
TRANSCENDENTAL LOGIC. SECOND DIVISION
TRANSCENDENTAL DIALECTIC.INTRODUCTION
I. Of Transcendental IllusoryAppearance.
II. Of Pure Reason as the Seat ofTranscendental Illusory Appearance
BOOK I. OF THE CONCEPTIONS OF PURE REASON
SECTION I Of Ideas in General
SECTION II. Of TranscendentalIdeas
SECTION III. System ofTranscendental Ideas.
BOOK II. OF THE DIALECTICAL PROCEDURE OF PUREREASON
CHAPTER I. Of the Paralogisms ofPure Reason
CHAPTER II. The Antinomy of PureReason.
CHAPTER III. The Ideal of PureReason.
3 TRANSCENDENTAL DOCTRINE OF METHOD.
3.1 CHAPTER I. The Discipline of Pure Reason
3.1.1 SECTION I. The Discipline of PureReason in the Sphere of Dogmatism
3.1.2 SECTION II. The Discipline of PureReason in Polemics
3.1.3 SECTION III. The Discipline of PureReason in Hypothesis
3.1.4 SECTION IV. The Discipline of PureReason in Relation to Proofs
3.2 CHAPTER II. The Canon of Pure Reason
3.2.1 SECTION I. Of the Ultimate End ofthe Pure Use of Reason
3.2.2 SECTION II. Of the Ideal of theSummum Bonum as a Determining Ground of the Ultimate End of PureReason
3.2.3 SECTION III. Of Opinion, Knowledge,and Belief
3.3 CHAPTER III. The Architectonic of PureReason
3.4 CHAPTER IV. The History of Pure Reason
评论
还没有评论。