China Maritime Selected Cases“一带一路”司法理论与实务纵览海事海商案例集

　　“一带一路”建设极具复杂性，相关的司法服务保障涵盖的法律问题范围很广。本书为《“一带一路”司法理论与实务纵览海事海商案例集》的英文版，推出英文版能够为国内外相关专家和实务界人士了解中国海事海商领域法律适用提供便利，增进沿线各国法律职业人士的相互了解、相互熟悉、相互认同。

Chapter OneDisputes over Contracts for the
Carriage of Goods by Sea
1.Shanghai Shenfu Chemical Co., Ltd. v. Hachiman Shipping S.A. and Dorval Kaiun
K. K. for Dispute over Compensation for Damage to Goods under a Contract for
Carriage of Cargo by SeaWang Shumei
2.A.P.MollerMaersk AS v. Shenzhen
office of Shanghai Xen Freight Agency Ltd. and Shanghai Xen Freight Agency Ltd
for Dispute over Container Demurrage in Contracts for Carriage of GoodsHu Fang
3.Al Arrab Contracting Co. v. Cosco Shipping Co., Ltd. for Dispute over a
Contract of Carriage of Goods by SeaDu YixingGu Enzhen
4.Shanghai Baozhi Photoelectric Technology Development Co., Ltd. v. Shenzhen
AirAsia International Freight Forwarding Co., Ltd. for Dispute over a Contract
for the Carriage of Goods by Sea Li LifeiGuangzhou
5.Aprile International Freight Forwarding (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. v. Cangzhou
Qiancheng SteelPipe Co., Ltd., Tianjin Branch of
Yetari International Freight Forwarding Co., Ltd., and COSCO Container Lines
Co., Ltd. for dispute over a contract for the carriage of goods by sea Li
TongZhao Wei
6.Shanghai Branch of Sunshine Property and Casualty Insurance Co., Ltd. v.
Maersk (China) Shipping Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Branch of Maersk (China)
Shipping Co., Ltd. for dispute over a contract for carriage of goods by
seaPingyang Danke
7.Guangxi Xianlin Import & Export Co., Ltd. v. Lucretia Shipping SA and
Qinzhou (China) Ocean Shipping Agency Co., Ltd. for Dispute over a Contract for
the Carriage of Goods by SeaHuang Siqi
8.Shenzhen Branch of PICC Property and Casualty Company Limited v. Shenzhen
China Progress International Forwarding Co., Ltd. for Dispute over a Contract
for Carriage of Goods by SeaNi Xuewei
9.Project Transportation Branch of Sinotrans Ltd.  v. Shenzhen Uptrans Logistics Co., Ltd. for
dispute over a contract for carriage of goods by seaPingyang Danke
Chapter TwoDisputes over Ocean Freight Forwarding Contracts
10.Shenzhen Zhu Chuan International Freight Forwarding Co., Ltd. v. Shenzhen
Longer Fertilizer Co., Ltd. for Dispute over a Freight Forwarding
ContractPingyang Danke
11.Dalian Dashan Metallurgical Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. v. Dalian
Branch of Shanghai High Quality Logistics International Freight Forwarding Co.,
Ltd.for Dispute over a Ocean Freight Forwarding ContractXin Xin
12.Foshan Fico Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Foshan Branch of DHL Global Forwarding
(China) Co., Ltd. and DHL Global Forwarding (China) Co., Ltd. for Disputes over
a Contract for Marine Freight Forwarding Yang Yaxiao
Chapter ThreeDisputes over Tort Damages
13.Fuzhou Ji Feng Shipping Co., Ltd. v. DAE HO SHIPPING Co., LTD. for Dispute
over Compensation for Damages Arising from Collision of VesselsZhang Bo
14.Dexian Co., Ltd. v.Tangshan Harbor Maoyun Shipping Co., Ltd. and Guangzhou
Huadu Subbranch of China United Property Insurance
Co., Ltd., and Third Party Mo for Disputes over Liability for Damages Arising
from Collision of VesselsHuang Siqi
15.Qingdao Zuode International Trade Co., Ltd. v. Tianjin Welcome Petrochemical
Technology Co., Ltd. for Disputes over Liability for Damage
to Goods Stored in PortsYang LingPei Daming
16.Jiangxi Rare Earth and Rare Metals Tungsten Group Import and Export Co.,
Ltd. v. Regional Container Lines Feeder Pte. Ltd., et al. for Dispute over
Liability for Marine Property DamageNi XueweiFu Junyang
Chapter FourOther Disputes
17.Xiamen Yinghai Industrial Development Co., Ltd. v. Maersk (China) Shipping
Co., Ltd. for Dispute over Damages for Harm to the Right of Operation of
International Maritime Freight ForwardingYu Xiaohan
18.Nanhai Rescue Bureau of the Ministry of Transport v. Archangelos Investments
E.N.E. and Shanghai Representative Office of Hong Kong Anda Olsen Co., Ltd. for
Dispute over a Contract on Salvage at Sea Ma Ling
19.Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering Co., Ltd. v. Glory Advance
Corporation for Dispute over a Ship Mortgage Contract Chen YanzhongWang Yan
20.DVB Bank SE v. ISIM Amin Limited and Shokooh Sahar Kish Shipping Co. for
disputes over ownership of vessel Lin Qiang
21.CSSC Chengxi Shipyard Co., Ltd. and Hubei Branch of Yong An Property
Insurance Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Tongbao Shipping Co., Ltd. and Guangzhou
Salvage Bureau for Dispute over a Marine Towage ContractOu Haiyan
22.Panisa International (Private) Limited v. Shenzhen Branch of PICC P&C
for Dispute over a Marine Insurance ContractXu Chunlong
23.Guangxi Gangqing Grease Co., Ltd. v. Shipowner or Bareboat Charterer of “Mykonos” for Application for the Arrest of a
VesselWang Mingsheng
24.Case of Application of Bunkeers Marine Pte Ltd. for Arrest of “Nasico Lion” before the Institution of an
ActionZhou Chengmin

　　PREFACE

　　“BELT & ROAD” INITIATIVE: JUDICIAL THEORIES AND PRACTICES SERIES

　　PREFACE

　　The “Belt & Road” Initiative is a major
strategic deployment made by the CPC Central Committee with President Xi
Jinping at its core out of consideration from both domestic and international
perspectives to proactively meet the profound changes in global situations, is
an important driver of the comprehensive deepening of reform in response to
practical demands in a new era, creates a new mode of international cooperation
and global governance, sets forth higher requirements for the building of the
rule of law in new situations, and provides even broader developmental space
for the work of the peoples courts as well as
jurisprudential study.

　　On July 8, 2015, the
Supreme Peoples Court issued the Several Opinions on
the Provision of Judicial Services and Safeguards by the Peoples Courts for the Development of the “Belt
& Road” Initiative, clarifying the guiding
principles and standards for the peoples courts at all
levels to hear “Belt & Road” related cases. In order to strengthen the theoretical research on
the judicial services and safeguards for the “Belt
& Road” Initiative, the Supreme Peoples Court formed the SPC Belt & Road Judicial Research Center,
under which there are judicial research bases, such as the SPC “Belt &
Road” Initiative Judicial Research Base, SPC FTZ Judicial Research Base, and
SPC Oceanic Judicial Protection Theoretical Research Base, and proof of foreign
law research bases.

　　For more than three
year, based on Chinas national conditions and judicial
patterns, all research bases have vigorously conducted jurisprudential research
on specific issues encountered in the development of the “Belt & Road” Initiative, borrowed
theories and practices from foreign jurisdictions, made tremendous
achievements, and played an import role in studying emerging judicial issues
and supporting national decisionmaking, among others.
In order to sum up judicial experience in the development of the “Belt & Road” Initiative in a timely
manner and maximize the service and guarantee role of the peoples courts in the development of the “Belt
& Road” Initiative, the SPC Belt & Road
Judicial Research Center compiled the series of “Belt
& Road” Initiative: Judicial Theories and
Practices.

　　The series is oriented
to the judicial needs in the development of the “Belt
& Road” Initiative, and pays attention to the
combination of theory and practice, particularly to the summarization of trial
experience in typical cases in the development of the “Belt & Road”
Initiative, promoting theoretical enrichment and innovation based on practice
to address practical issues. The series also highlights a strategic standpoint
and a full field of view, and summarizes achievements in proof of foreign law
and research results of great reference value to judicial practices, not only
as an important summarization of Chinas practical
judicial experience but also as a means to present the world with Chinas judicial wisdom and judicial experience.

　　As research deepens,
the SPC Belt & Road Judicial Research Center will conduct further forward

　　looking, pertinent, and
reserve research on emerging issues in the development of the “Belt & Road” Initiative, offer more
specialized and constructive recommendations, and release more books that may
guide practices and serve as an important reference for decisionmaking under the series, so that the series could truly become
reference books for theoretical research and practice discussions, providing
high quality and high level theoretical guidance for the peoples courts to serve and protect the development of the “Belt &
Road” Initiative.

　　Luo Dongchuan

　　VicePresident of the Supreme Peoples Court and
Justice

　　March 7th, 2019