当代澳大利亚土著文学中的身份主题研究

　　《当代澳大利亚土著文学中的身份主题研究》共分五个部分：绪论部分包括文献综述和理论框架，简述了国内外关于澳大利亚土著文学及身份建构等问题的研究成果。章探讨马德鲁鲁的代表作《野猫掉下来了》中体现的宗教身份。第二章探讨萨丽．摩根的《我的位置》中的女性身份。第三章分析阿莱克西斯。赖特的《卡奔塔利亚湾》中的政治身份。结论部分总结了宗教身份、女性身份和政治身份等三个侧面所形成的“杂糅”身份重塑。后指出本论文的创新之处：身份建构的中间性决定了当代澳大利亚土著身份重塑的杂糅性。这种杂糅性身份体现在哲理基础和表现形式上。在多元文化政策成为澳大利亚国策的当下，澳大利亚土著身份重塑有助于加速其国内的种族和解进程。

Acknowledgements
Abstract
摘要
A List of Name Equivalents
Introduction
Chapter 1 Dreaming as Religious Identity
Chapter 2 Bio-Writing as Gender Identity
Chapter 3 Native Title as Political Identity
Conclusion
Bibliography
Appendix 1 “Aboriginal Charter of Rights”
Appendix 2 An Index of Criticism of Australian Aboriginal
Literature
Notes

　　1．The Summary of the Development of ContemporaryAustralian
Aboriginal Literaturea
　　a．The Paternalism in the First Wave
　　The father of Australian Aboriginal literature is
DavidUnaiD0n（1872-1967），who is honored on the banknote of
50Australian dollars．The entire corpus of Unaipon’S written
workscombinCS the deceptive simplicity of the fable with the
spiritualdepth of rcligious verse；the apparent realism of
anthropologicalobserVation with the“surrealism”of Dreaming
narrative．AndwCaVing its way through all of Unaipon’s writing is a
highly-developed political and national consciousness on behalf
ofindigenous Australians as well as extremely clever deployment
ofhumot and insight．（Bennett 1998：334）
　　His literary achievements were mostly accomplished in
the1920s．Native Legends，his most important representative work，waS
Dublished 1929．But how can one justify a discussion ofUnaiDon in a
diSCussion of contemporary indigenous writing？Thereare a number of
answers to this question．One of the mostimportant being the fact
that Unaipon’s work is published anddiscussed more in the 1990s
than in any previous decades．BeingdepiCted 0n the new Australian$50
note released in 1955，hisiconiC Significance has also increased
dramatically’a trend furtherstrengthened by the widespread use of
Unaipon’s face in the printand television advertising．In one sense
all of David Unaipon’swriting Can be seen as petitioning the past
for long-delayedreC0gnition of his custodial role as a
storyteller．But petitioningwas by no means Unaipon’s only foray
into the literature ofentreaty．
　　……